ProtocolBreaker

Cross Domain Solutions (CDS) Content Transformation High Assurance

Challenge

Federal agencies and commercial enterprises operating in highly regulated environments required a next-generation solution for secure data transfer across controlled interfaces and cross-domain boundaries. Organizations needed to ensure deterministic parsing and content disarmament while maintaining operational efficiencyβ€”critical for both government missions and commercial operations handling sensitive data across security domains.

Solution

Talon Security Engineering led the architecture and development of ProtocolBreaker, a sophisticated content transformation and protocol-normalization engine designed to meet the stringent requirements of cross-domain data transfer.

Key Features

  • Deterministic Parsing: Ensures predictable and secure content analysis across all data types
  • Content Disarmament & Reconstruction (CDR): Removes malicious code while preserving data integrity
  • Protocol Normalization: Standardizes diverse data formats for consistent security processing
  • High-Assurance Workflow: Multi-layered security controls meeting DoD IL5/IL6 requirements
  • Real-time Processing: Minimal latency for mission-critical operations
  • Audit & Compliance: Comprehensive logging for security audits and compliance verification

Architecture

graph LR A[Untrusted Domain] -->|Data Transfer| B[ProtocolBreaker Engine] B -->|Parse| C[Content Analysis] C -->|Disarm| D[CDR Module] D -->|Normalize| E[Protocol Handler] E -->|Validate| F[Security Gateway] F -->|Transfer| G[Trusted Domain] H[Audit System] -.->|Monitor| B H -.->|Log| C H -.->|Track| D style B fill:#06A3DA,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style F fill:#34AD54,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff style H fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

AWS Infrastructure

graph TB subgraph "AWS GovCloud - Untrusted VPC" A[S3 Ingress Bucket
IL2] B[Lambda Parser
Deterministic Analysis] end subgraph "Processing Layer" C[ECS Fargate
CDR Engine] D[Step Functions
Workflow Orchestration] E[SQS Queue
Message Buffer] end subgraph "AWS GovCloud - Trusted VPC" F[S3 Egress Bucket
IL5/IL6] G[CloudWatch
Audit Logs] end A -->|Trigger| B B -->|Queue| E E -->|Process| C C -->|Orchestrate| D D -->|Validated Data| F B -.->|Log| G C -.->|Log| G D -.->|Log| G style C fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style D fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style F fill:#34AD54,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

Technology Stack

AWS GovCloud ECS Fargate AWS Lambda Step Functions S3 SQS CloudWatch Python FIPS 140-2

Results

99.9%

Threat Detection Rate

<500ms

Average Processing Time

Zero

Security Incidents

SentinelForge Test Harness

Security Testing Red/Blue Team Purple Team Operations Automated Validation

Challenge

Organizations implementing ProtocolBreaker required a comprehensive testing framework to validate the security effectiveness of content filtering, sanitization, and protocol normalization capabilities. Traditional testing approaches were insufficient for evaluating the sophisticated threat detection and mitigation features of Cross Domain Solutions (CDS).

Solution

Talon Security Engineering developed SentinelForge, an advanced purple team test harness that operates as a sidecar service to systematically test ProtocolBreaker implementations. The harness combines red team attack simulation with blue team defensive validation, providing comprehensive security assurance through automated adversarial testing.

Key Capabilities

  • Purple Team Methodology: Integrated red/blue team operations for comprehensive security validation
  • Ingress/Egress Stimulation: Automated test payload generation targeting both input and output interfaces
  • Threat Vector Library: Extensive collection of malicious payloads, protocol exploits, and evasion techniques
  • Sanitization Validation: Verifies content disarmament and reconstruction effectiveness
  • Performance Benchmarking: Measures filtering efficiency under various load conditions
  • Compliance Reporting: Generates audit-ready reports for security certification processes
  • Flexible Deployment: Operates as internal sidecar or external testing service

Purple Team Testing Architecture

sequenceDiagram autonumber participant RT as πŸ”΄ Red Team
Attack Simulator participant SF as 🟣 SentinelForge
Test Orchestrator participant PB as πŸ›‘οΈ ProtocolBreaker
Under Test participant BT as πŸ”΅ Blue Team
Validator participant AR as πŸ“Š Analytics
& Reporting Note over RT,AR: Test Cycle Initialization SF->>RT: Load threat vectors SF->>BT: Configure validation rules Note over RT,AR: Ingress Interface Testing RT->>SF: Generate malicious payload SF->>PB: Inject test data (Ingress) PB->>PB: Parse & Filter PB->>BT: Output sanitized data BT->>SF: Validate sanitization SF->>AR: Log test result Note over RT,AR: Egress Interface Testing RT->>SF: Generate evasion attempt SF->>PB: Inject test data (Egress) PB->>PB: Normalize & Validate PB->>BT: Output normalized data BT->>SF: Verify normalization SF->>AR: Log test result Note over RT,AR: Performance & Stress Testing RT->>SF: Generate high-volume attacks SF->>PB: Sustained load injection PB->>BT: Processed outputs BT->>SF: Measure throughput & accuracy SF->>AR: Performance metrics Note over RT,AR: Reporting & Analysis AR->>AR: Aggregate results AR->>SF: Generate compliance report SF->>SF: Identify vulnerabilities
Sequence Legend

πŸ”΄ Red Team: Generates adversarial test payloads and attack vectors

🟣 SentinelForge: Orchestrates testing workflow and coordinates teams

πŸ›‘οΈ ProtocolBreaker: System under test performing security functions

πŸ”΅ Blue Team: Validates defensive effectiveness and sanitization

πŸ“Š Analytics: Collects metrics and generates compliance reports

Numbers (1-15): Sequential order of operations in test cycle

Deployment Architecture

graph TB subgraph "Internal Deployment - Sidecar Mode" A1[SentinelForge
Test Controller] A2[ProtocolBreaker
Instance] A3[Shared Network
Namespace] end subgraph "External Deployment - Remote Testing" B1[SentinelForge
Test Service] B2[VPN/Secure
Connection] B3[ProtocolBreaker
Production] end subgraph "Test Payload Generation" C1[πŸ“¦ Threat Vector
Library] C2[πŸ”§ Payload
Generator] C3[🎯 Attack
Scenarios] end subgraph "Validation Engine" D1[βœ… Sanitization
Checker] D2[πŸ“ Performance
Monitor] D3[πŸ” Anomaly
Detector] end subgraph "Reporting & Analytics" E1[πŸ“Š Metrics
Dashboard] E2[πŸ“„ Compliance
Reports] E3[🚨 Alert
System] end A1 -->|Local IPC| A2 A2 -->|Share| A3 B1 -->|Secure Tunnel| B2 B2 -->|Test Traffic| B3 C1 -->|Feed| C2 C2 -->|Generate| C3 C3 -->|Inject| A1 C3 -->|Inject| B1 A2 -->|Results| D1 B3 -->|Results| D1 D1 -->|Analyze| D2 D2 -->|Detect| D3 D3 -->|Visualize| E1 D3 -->|Generate| E2 D3 -->|Trigger| E3 style A1 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style B1 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style C2 fill:#E74C3C,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff style D1 fill:#3498DB,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff style E2 fill:#2ECC71,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
Architecture Legend

🟣 Purple Nodes: SentinelForge test orchestration components

πŸ”΄ Red Nodes: Attack simulation and payload generation

πŸ”΅ Blue Nodes: Defensive validation and analysis

🟒 Green Nodes: Reporting and compliance outputs

Solid Lines: Data flow and test traffic

Deployment Modes: Internal sidecar or external service

Technology Stack

Python Docker Kubernetes gRPC PostgreSQL Prometheus Grafana Metasploit MITRE ATT&CK

Results

10,000+

Threat Vectors Tested

99.7%

Attack Detection Rate

80%

Faster Security Validation

Audit-Ready

Compliance Reports

Security Impact

"SentinelForge transformed our security validation process from manual, time-consuming testing to automated, comprehensive purple team operations. The ability to continuously test our ProtocolBreaker implementation against evolving threat vectors gives us confidence in our Cross Domain Solutions (CDS) posture. The detailed compliance reports have streamlined our certification processes significantly."

β€” Federal Agency Security Team

Aphotic AI Platform

AI/ML Automation RMF Compliance Cloud Engineering

Challenge

Federal agencies faced significant resource constraints in maintaining RMF compliance, implementing STIG controls, and managing secure cloud infrastructure. Manual processes were time-consuming, error-prone, and difficult to scale across multiple programs.

Solution

Talon Security Engineering developed Aphotic, an advanced Cyber-AI engineering toolset that automates complex cybersecurity tasks through intelligent, context-aware agents and model-driven automation.

Key Capabilities

  • Automated RMF Documentation: AI-generated security control narratives aligned with NIST SP 800-53
  • STIG Compliance Automation: Intelligent scanning and remediation of security technical implementation guides
  • Cloud Security Engineering: Automated infrastructure-as-code generation with built-in security controls
  • Context-Aware Agents: AI agents that understand mission context and security requirements
  • Continuous Monitoring: Real-time compliance tracking and automated reporting
  • Knowledge Base Integration: Leverages DoD, NIST, and CISA security frameworks

AI Architecture

graph TB subgraph "User Interface" A[Security Engineer] B[Compliance Officer] end subgraph "AI Agent Layer" C[RMF Agent
Control Narratives] D[STIG Agent
Compliance Checks] E[IaC Agent
Secure Templates] F[Orchestrator
Multi-Agent Coordination] end subgraph "Knowledge Base" G[NIST 800-53
Controls] H[DISA STIGs
Requirements] I[AWS Best
Practices] end subgraph "Execution Layer" J[Terraform/CDK
Deployment] K[Compliance
Reports] end A -->|Request| F B -->|Request| F F -->|Route| C F -->|Route| D F -->|Route| E C -.->|Query| G D -.->|Query| H E -.->|Query| I C -->|Generate| K D -->|Validate| K E -->|Deploy| J style F fill:#06A3DA,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style C fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff style D fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff style E fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

AWS Implementation

graph LR subgraph "Frontend" A[Web UI
CloudFront + S3] end subgraph "AI Processing" B[Bedrock
Claude/Titan] C[SageMaker
Custom Models] D[Lambda
Agent Runtime] end subgraph "Data & Knowledge" E[OpenSearch
Vector DB] F[DynamoDB
State Management] G[S3
Knowledge Base] end subgraph "Deployment" H[CodePipeline
CI/CD] I[CloudFormation
IaC Deployment] end A -->|API Gateway| D D -->|Invoke| B D -->|Train/Infer| C B -->|Query| E D -->|State| F E -.->|Index| G D -->|Trigger| H H -->|Deploy| I style B fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style C fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style E fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

Technology Stack

AWS Bedrock SageMaker OpenSearch Lambda DynamoDB Python LangChain Claude 3

Results

85%

Time Reduction in RMF Documentation

95%

STIG Compliance Rate

10x

Faster IaC Generation

$2M+

Annual Cost Savings

Onco-AI Assistive Tool

Healthcare AI Clinical Decision Support HIPAA Compliant

Challenge

Pediatric oncology teams faced overwhelming administrative burdens, language barriers with diverse patient families, and the need for rapid access to treatment protocols and clinical decision support during critical care moments.

Solution

Talon Security Engineering provided technical strategy and architecture for Onco-AI, a pediatric oncology support system that combines clinical domain knowledge, AI-based decision assistance, and multilingual communication capabilities to improve physician efficiency and family engagement.

Key Features

  • Clinical Decision Support: AI-powered treatment protocol recommendations based on patient history and current research
  • Multilingual Communication: Real-time translation and culturally-appropriate medical information for families
  • Treatment Navigation: Guided workflows for complex pediatric oncology care pathways
  • Knowledge Integration: Seamless access to clinical trials, research papers, and treatment guidelines
  • HIPAA Compliance: End-to-end encryption and audit logging for patient data protection
  • Mobile-First Design: Accessible on tablets and smartphones for point-of-care use

System Architecture

graph TB subgraph "User Layer" A[Physician Portal] B[Family Portal
Multilingual] end subgraph "AI Services" C[Clinical AI
Decision Support] D[NLP Engine
Translation] E[Knowledge Graph
Medical Ontology] end subgraph "Data Layer" F[EHR Integration
HL7/FHIR] G[Clinical Trials DB] H[Research Papers
PubMed] end subgraph "Security" I[HIPAA Vault
Encrypted Storage] J[Audit Logs] end A -->|Query| C B -->|Request| D C -->|Access| E E -.->|Pull| F E -.->|Query| G E -.->|Search| H C -->|Store| I D -->|Store| I A -.->|Log| J B -.->|Log| J style C fill:#06A3DA,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style I fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

AWS Healthcare Architecture

graph LR subgraph "Frontend - HIPAA Compliant" A[React App
CloudFront] end subgraph "API & AI" B[API Gateway
WAF Protected] C[Bedrock
Medical AI] D[Comprehend Medical
NLP] end subgraph "Data Storage" E[RDS Aurora
Encrypted] F[S3
PHI Vault] end subgraph "Integration" G[HealthLake
FHIR Store] H[Lambda
EHR Connectors] end subgraph "Security & Compliance" I[KMS
Encryption] J[CloudTrail
Audit] K[GuardDuty
Threat Detection] end A -->|HTTPS| B B -->|Invoke| C B -->|Process| D C -->|Query| E D -->|Store| F H -->|Sync| G G -->|Read| E I -.->|Encrypt| E I -.->|Encrypt| F J -.->|Monitor| B K -.->|Protect| B style C fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style G fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style I fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

Technology Stack

AWS HealthLake Bedrock Comprehend Medical RDS Aurora KMS React HIPAA FHIR

Results

40%

Reduction in Administrative Time

25+

Languages Supported

98%

Family Satisfaction Score

100%

HIPAA Compliance

Government Cybersecurity Modernization

Federal Advisory Zero Trust Multi-Cloud Quantum-Ready

Challenge

Federal agencies required comprehensive guidance on modernizing their cybersecurity posture to meet evolving threats, comply with Zero Trust mandates, and prepare for quantum computing risks while maintaining operational continuity across multi-region cloud environments.

Solution

Talon Security Engineering provides ongoing advisory services to government programs, delivering strategic guidance on secure multi-region AWS GovCloud architectures, cross-domain workflow security, and enterprise cybersecurity modernization with a focus on emerging technologies and threat landscapes.

Advisory Services

  • Multi-Region GovCloud Architecture: Resilient, compliant cloud infrastructure across AWS regions
  • Zero Trust Implementation: Federated identity, micro-segmentation, and continuous verification
  • AI-Augmented Engineering: Integration of AI/ML for automated security operations and threat detection
  • Quantum-Prepared Infrastructure: Post-quantum cryptography readiness and migration planning
  • Cross Domain Solutions (CDS): Secure data flows between classification levels and security domains
  • Compliance Automation: Continuous ATO and FedRAMP compliance monitoring

Zero Trust Architecture

graph TB subgraph "Identity Layer" A[Federated IdP
PIV/CAC] B[MFA
Continuous Auth] end subgraph "Policy Engine" C[Policy Decision
Point] D[Policy Enforcement
Point] end subgraph "Micro-Segmentation" E[Network Zones
VPC Isolation] F[Application
Segmentation] end subgraph "Data Protection" G[Encryption
At Rest/Transit] H[DLP
Macie] end subgraph "Monitoring" I[SIEM
Security Hub] J[Threat Intel
GuardDuty] end A -->|Authenticate| B B -->|Request| C C -->|Enforce| D D -->|Access| E E -->|Isolate| F F -.->|Protect| G G -.->|Monitor| H D -.->|Log| I I -.->|Detect| J style C fill:#06A3DA,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style D fill:#06A3DA,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style I fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#091E3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

Multi-Region GovCloud Architecture

graph TB subgraph "AWS GovCloud US-East" A1[VPC
Primary] A2[EKS Cluster
Workloads] A3[RDS Aurora
Primary DB] end subgraph "AWS GovCloud US-West" B1[VPC
DR Site] B2[EKS Cluster
Standby] B3[RDS Aurora
Read Replica] end subgraph "Global Services" C[Route 53
DNS Failover] D[CloudFront
Edge Delivery] E[WAF
DDoS Protection] end subgraph "Security & Compliance" F[Security Hub
Central Monitoring] G[Config
Compliance] H[CloudTrail
Multi-Region] end C -->|Route| D D -->|Protect| E E -->|Primary| A1 E -->|Failover| B1 A1 -->|Deploy| A2 B1 -->|Deploy| B2 A2 -->|Write| A3 A3 -->|Replicate| B3 A1 -.->|Monitor| F B1 -.->|Monitor| F F -->|Audit| G G -.->|Log| H style A2 fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style B2 fill:#FF9900,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff style F fill:#FF6B6B,stroke:#232F3E,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff

Technology Stack

AWS GovCloud EKS Security Hub IAM Identity Center Transit Gateway Quantum KMS Terraform FedRAMP

Results

99.99%

Infrastructure Uptime

6 Months

Faster ATO Process

100%

Zero Trust Maturity

IL5/IL6

Impact Level Certified

Ready to Transform Your Cybersecurity?

Let's discuss how we can help your organization achieve similar results

Schedule a Consultation